Press Release: Are Textbooks Holding Back Cures for Cancer?

By Perry Marshall

July 29, 2021 | 0 Comment

Famed Researchers Highlight Glaring Omissions About the Power of Our Cells

Say Modernizing What We Teach About Our Ability To Influence Evolution Can Change How Medicine Is Practiced

Famed Oxford Scientist Denis Noble stands next to a bust of Charles Darwin on the Galápagos Islands, where Darwin developed his Theory of Evolution. Noble believes textbooks have omitted much of Darwin’s original work and says correcting how evolution is taught holds they key to curing diseases. (PRNewsfoto/Natural Code LLC)

OXFORD, England, July 28, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Misunderstandings and omissions from Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution have spawned massive failures in cancer, antibiotics and nutrition – and it’s time to rediscover the real Darwin. That’s the view of famed Oxford scientist Denis Noble, creator of the first 3-D model of the heart, longtime author on evolutionary change and scientific advisor to the $10 Million Evolution 2.0 Prize created by biotech company Natural Code LLC.

Noble is challenging long-standing theories that claim evolution is gradual, when studies now show cancer cells evolve in days. “We will never understand cancer until we recognize how tumors adapt on an hourly basis,” offers Noble. “But if we show our pre-med students how the human body directs its own evolutions, it will forever transform how they practice medicine.”

That’s why researchers around the world (including 70 scientists from The Third Way of Evolution), are pressing for significant textbook revisions and long-overdue updates to the foundations of biology. The group is shining a spotlight on two critical areas of education they say are inaccurate:

(1)  Darwin’s finest insights are wrongly interpreted or overlooked;

(2)   17 transformational discoveries from molecular genetics and genome sequence data are omitted from biology’s most used textbook.

They insist up-to-date evolution curriculum is key to rapid breakthroughs for treating disease and curing cancer. 

“Students are being taught outdated models,” says Noble. “For a century, mainstream science taught fatalism – and insisted we’re stuck with whatever genes we inherited from our parents. Today we know our bodies and cells are actually in charge of our own evolution; for instance, athletes transform the way genes express because exercise causes every cell to function differently – and some of this gets passed on across generations.

“The most valuable discoveries are not gene-centric, they are cell- and body-centric, yet we are ignoring this. It matters enormously whether we teach that we’re merely passive vehicles for our genes vs. what we now understand – all living organisms are intentional creatures who can alter their genomes when it becomes necessary. It urgently needs rectifying.”

More high-profile researchers agree, outdated curriculum has held back biomedical progress. “Scientists like Denis Noble and The Third Way are certainly right in demanding new textbooks on evolution,” says Cambridge’s Bernhard Strauss, chief editor of the book Rethinking Cancer. “Most books on evolution omit the most important cellular processes that actually drive evolution, particularly rapid adaptation and the ability to generate novel features. Teaching these concepts within Darwin’s evolutionary framework will answer many currently unresolved questions in biology. It would also change our understanding of infectious diseases and ecology, and enable innovative approaches to explaining and treating cancer.”

A new paper by Noble and a second with University of Chicago microbial geneticist James Shapiro, plus a Voices From Oxford video from Darwin’s ancestral home, trace the history of distortions on Darwinism and offer crucial recommendations on how to correct:

  • In the first, most thorough published work of its Illusions of the Modern Synthesis, Noble recounts in detail the damage done to Darwin’s legacy. He shows inaccuracies evolutionary theory has been saddled with in “Illusions of the Modern Synthesis” (March 2021). “Evolution is not passive or accidental,” explains Noble. “Darwin suspected evolutionary change is engineered by the organism itself – and he was right. We pass on what we do and learn to offspring. Despite his predictions being censored and ignored, the record is irrefutable: evolution is intentional, not random.”
  • Noble and Shapiro recently published “What Prevents Mainstream Evolutionists From Teaching the Whole Truth About How Genomes Evolve?” (May 2021). An accompanying infographic documents how popular evolution books are 30 years out of date and fail to report major discoveries in molecular biology and genomics which challenge the basic assumptions since Darwin’s time, referred to as “Neo-Darwinism.”
  • Noble hosted a roundtable video conversation from Darwin’s home, Downe House, to highlight landmark findings textbooks failed to credit Darwin for including: Evolution occurs sometimes rapidly, other times hardly at all; organisms learn and transfer information to developing sperm and eggs. Darwin was scorned for his view and today’s “Neo-Darwinism” continues to mistakenly teach “genetic fatalism.”

Experts insist the science of epigenetics – that behaviors and environment cause changes affecting the way genes work – illustrates how impressive high-speed evolution takes place alongside slower, gradual alterations. “Our life experiences, like responses to stress, impact evolution from one generation to the next,” explains John Torday, Professor of Evolutionary Medicine at UCLA. “A smoking grandmother alters the way DNA gets read without changing the genes themselves, and passes asthma to her granddaughter. We need to do a better job teaching this than we currently are.”

Physician-scientists at the leading edge of treatment breakthroughs believe there will be significant benefits for diseases like cancer once curricula include contemporary knowledge. “Cancer cells resist radiation and chemotherapy via remarkable built-in evolutionary toolkits,” says Columbia University oncologist Azra Raza, author of The First Cell. “They respond to threats at tremendous speed. It’s time for textbooks to report this, and for practicing oncologists to factor this into patient treatment protocols.”

Noble laments billions spent on the notion genes determine disease and health in a one-way, bottom-up framework in which humans have little control. “Genes are tools, not rigid programs,” he adds. “Genes don’t run cells any more than USB sticks run computers. This is great news. It gives us greater power over our own health. It’s time to acknowledge the purpose and intentionality in our own bodies and through our own cells. It’s time to focus on the empowerment that Darwin suspected and science now shows us is true. This is inexplicably missing in our education and training of next-generation scientists and physicians.”

“Some of Darwin’s finest theories were ignored, stifling breakthroughs for decades. But finally embracing them brings new approaches in so many diseases, perhaps even in generational health since we now suspect things like fetal alcohol syndrome and family trauma are passed down. Getting this rediscovery of history right – a “Darwin 2.0″ – is about more than textbooks. Just imagine what happens when we finally tap into the adaptive power of the cell.”

Further conversation with Noble can be found here: Denis Noble Q&A 

Natural Code is a private Investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code. Its mission is to discover, develop and commercialize core principles of nature which give rise to information, consciousness and intelligence. Natural Code is sponsor of the largest award in basic science history.

Photo –



Perry Marshall

NASA Jet Propulsion Labs uses his 80/20 Curve as a productivity tool. His reinvention of the Pareto Principle is published in Harvard Business Review. His Ultimate Guide to Google Ads is the best-selling book on internet advertising. A business strategist and electrical engineer, Perry founded the largest science research award in history. The $10 million Evolution 2.0 Prize will be judged by scientists from Harvard, Oxford, and MIT. Seeing that existing financial incentives favor prolonging cancer rather than curing it; and realizing the medical profession has incorrectly defined the disease in the first place... he chose to apply entrepreneurial thinking to the problem.


It's time to
Donate Now